Many of us are working professionals that depend on Freehand
for our livelihoods, and yes, we could migrate to Illustrator, but
many like me just don't want to. Why, because we believe that
Freehand is a better program, end of argument.
Frankly I am sick and tired of the hiatus that Freehand has been in. What is it going to take someone (anyone) from Adobe to step up to the plate and disclose what is going on with Freehand. Is it dead or alive? A simple question that deserves a simple answer.
What's the big secret all about... do we really need to wait for the next version of Illustrator to find out if the features of Freehand have been integrated? It's not like disclosing this information is going to effect the share price or the sales of Illustrator, after all the have a MONOPOLY on vector software.
Adobe needs to treat working professionals with professional courtesy, like the truth on Freehands future for instance. Unfortunately it appears that Adobe knows that Freehand users have nowhere to go, so they have decided to just ignore us until we go away.
Frankly I am sick and tired of the hiatus that Freehand has been in. What is it going to take someone (anyone) from Adobe to step up to the plate and disclose what is going on with Freehand. Is it dead or alive? A simple question that deserves a simple answer.
What's the big secret all about... do we really need to wait for the next version of Illustrator to find out if the features of Freehand have been integrated? It's not like disclosing this information is going to effect the share price or the sales of Illustrator, after all the have a MONOPOLY on vector software.
Adobe needs to treat working professionals with professional courtesy, like the truth on Freehands future for instance. Unfortunately it appears that Adobe knows that Freehand users have nowhere to go, so they have decided to just ignore us until we go away.